![validity of the mmpi-2 validity of the mmpi-2](http://image.slideserve.com/1224994/validity-scales-of-the-mmpi-2-n.jpg)
Usually, anything above a 75 T-Score denotes a very high ranking on that scale, that is, within the top 1% of the population. Likewise, anything above a T-Score of 65 falls outside the normal range (among the top 3 to 5% of the general population). T-Scores are not percentages, but may be translated into percentages. What you will be paying attention to are the T-Scores, not the Raw Scores, unless otherwise specified. Please note that the MMPI-2 produces T-Scores and Raw Scores.
VALIDITY OF THE MMPI 2 FREE
To take the MMPI-2 free of charge, click here. Each of these is in itself composed of various other sub-scales. Once validity of the results are established, a profile is created employing the 10 Clinical Scales: hypochondriasis ( Hs), depression ( D), hysteria ( Hy), psychopathic deviate ( Pd), masculinity/femininity ( Mf), paranoia ( Pa), psychathenia ( Pt), schizophrenia ( Sc), hypomania ( Ma), and social introversion ( Si). Using 567 true or false questions, it rates the tester on 130 categories (validity scales included). to create a set of scales that accurately measure the core psychological constructs of the Clinical scales whilst enhancing convergent and discriminant validity.The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) is the most comprehensive personality test currently available. The results also support the aims of Tellegen et al. The findings provide strong support for the construct validity of the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF RC scales and the assessment of personality disorders in a forensic setting. The RC scales also accounted for additional variance over the NEO-PI-R domain scales for 8 out of the 10 SCID-II PQ personality disorder raw scores and provided a clinically accurate profile of personality disorders when expressed in their more pathological variants in a forensic population. The findings for this study demonstrated the construct validity of the RC scales whenĬompared to the SCID-II PQ personality disorder raw scores and the NEO-PI-R domainĪnd facet scales. This study utilised a forensic sample (n = 83) in order to analyse the construct validity of the RC scales when compared to the Structured Clinical Interview for the fourth edition of the DSM (DSM-IV APA, 1994) Axis II Disorders-Personality Questionnaire (SCID-II PQ First, Gibbon, Spitzer, Williams & Benjamin, 1997) and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R Costa & McCrae, 1992). Tellegen et al.'s project resulted in the development of nine RC scales that were designed to be independent of the pervasive influence of the first factor, more distinctive and a more accurate measure of the core psychological constructs the original Clinical scales were designed to measure.
![validity of the mmpi-2 validity of the mmpi-2](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/76129558/mini_magick20211211-3469-1e3tuvk.png)
Limitations of the Clinical scales and to measure the core psychological constructs of each of the Clinical scales whilst enhancing convergent and particularly discriminant validity. (2003) constructed the RC scales to address the perceived psychometric (MMPI-2 Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) and MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008) and the assessment of Scales (Tellegen et al., 2003) of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 The current study examined the construct validity of the Restructured Clinical (RC)